LGBT Weird Demands: Don’t call it ‘breastfeeding’, but ‘chest-feeding’!

The recent line of demands from the LGBT communities as they try to secure their rights and justice is very depressing and infringing on the rights of others! Actually, I argue, in general, LGBT community is slowly becoming a threat to other people’s freedoms. And this isn’t good, not at all! What are am I talking about?

Stop saying ‘mother’, but a ‘birthing parent’, LGBT demands!

Few days ago, the Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, a trust that manages many hospitals and other health services in UK, London, ordered or forced health workers, specifically midwives, to stop using words like ‘breastfeeding’, ‘mother’, ‘breastmilk’, maternal services’, etc so as to sound more LGBT friendly! In the new gender inclusive language policy, the ‘sane’ people at the trust insisted that words like ‘chest-feeding’, the ‘birthing parent’, ‘chest milk’, and ‘perinatal services’ respectively will be used instead! According to the Sunday Morning Herald, the new terms would be effected across all platforms; verbal in daily communications, hospitals’ leaflets and documents, and the websites or social media pages! I tried checking out the trust’s website here (05/03/2021), and, it seems, the changes aren’t there yet!

So, tell me, what is this?

I am not the only one asking these questions! According to BBC, many didn’t welcome this. Some trans-gender activists themselves didn’t agree with this as well. I mean, how can one secure freedom by taking away the freedoms of others? Listen to BBC report: ‘“One trans man told me he is “disappointed” that language meant to include him is so divisive, as “adding others should not subtract”‘. More from BBC report:

“‘Transgender advocate Debbie Hayton expressed concern over the plans. “Trying to control the language of others does transgender people no favors at all,” said Dr. Hayton, who describes herself as a transgender campaigner concerned about the “rights of other vulnerable groups”. “We should be living in society, not imposing upon it.”‘

A famous British broadcaster and journalist, Julia Hartley Brewer, kicked against this proposition during a serious debate with Chay Brown, director of a trans rights group, TransActual. In the fierce talkRadio debate, Julia marked, ‘your chest isn’t feeding your child. Your breast is!’

Watch the full video debate here:

Indeed, as reflected in some tweets in response to her stand, biologically, women are the only ones capable of getting pregnant, giving birth, and breastfeeding babies. To deny this or to rephrase it is to degrade women everywhere! Additionally, this is a strike on free speech. You are literally forcing people to drop language X and use language Y! It is totally insane. See below screenshots:

I had followed a similar debate on retalk, the new reddit-like platform for non-woke people or conservatives. In the discussion, a long list of discussants had shown dissatisfaction with the direction the LGBT activism is taking. Sadly, a revisit of the same discussion was futile; the discussion link seems to have been removed! (See below).

On LGBT new twist: It is a ridiculous move!

In my view, I call this a ‘ridiculous’ move! Part of the reasons the LGBT community uses or should use to convince us about their rights is their ‘belief in self’ or self-esteem. However, if they can be offended when we rightly and biologically refer to a mother (a woman) as a mother and her baby-feeding as breastfeeding, then the LGBT guys have an even bigger problem; lack of self-esteem or a belief in their existence or them being part of nature! Why are they easily offended? It should be clear that the argument to tolerate gays, lesbian, and the bisexuals, has been or should be about gender and NOT sex! However, if biology or science can be distorted in a world so modern and learned like ours, then the devil is seriously working!

I mean, this is simple biology; women have breasts that have milk to feed babies. And men don’t have them! Women have uterus or womb, and can carry babies to term, deliver or birth them, and feed them with breast milk. If someone can’t contain this, then I surely don’t know what to call him or her! With gender titles and roles, LGBT community can do all they want! I mean, it doesn’t bother me much (I am kidding; I am just sacrificing) when someone with a vagina and womb and breasts calls herself a ‘he’, and goes ahead and does various activities as a ‘real’ (for lack of a better word) he! She is a woman biologically, but a man by choice and roles! That was the debate. And, roughly, we had tolerated it!

However, if LGBT can start denying biological and scientific facts in favor of their path, then we have a serious problem! Later, they will force us into denying ourselves, into calling a stone a bread, into sleeping with animals (after all, it is all sex), into anything since we will no longer be able to examine and tell a bit of reality! What is this? Pure madness!

READ THIS TOO: Is legal law against homosexuality necessary in Uganda?

Additionally, I sometimes wonder if these people have mothers and sisters! Of course, they do! However, it bogs me down to see how one can deny the existence of his mother or sister to this level! How can you tell a woman who breastfed you that she is chest-feeding? Isn’t that ridiculous? Why? Because it is not true!

And here is another big reason; you won’t escape the consequences! This is a must read article about gender dysphoria and consequences of divergency from nature in excitement or fun way! In the article, Glenn T. Stanton, director of family formation studies at Focus on the Family organization, writes:

“When you stray from the clear and universally marked path of nature, confidently claiming that new paths are just as good, it can be fun and exciting for a while. But inevitably you will find yourself lost in troubling places you never bargained for. Chestfeeding is marking such a trail. It no doubt creeps out many trans advocates and feminists. It is merely the latest in a series of unanticipated backfires on those who thought they were doing good in promoting trans politics.”

LGBT activism undermines women emancipation and empowerment

Apparently, I insist, the fight for LGBT rights seems to be the most dangerous hindrance to true woman emancipation and empowerment. In one way, the ‘liars’ (LGBT or left wing activists) are screaming, ‘we want to see women empowered and respected’ and, on the other hand, they are taking away all that makes a woman a woman! This is hypocrisy. And it should stop. Women find pleasure in being women. It is what women emancipation and empowerment is about. To let a woman be. And you wanna kill all of that!

J.K Rowling on LGBT activism and Women Emancipation

The famous J.K Rowling or Joanne Rowling, famous for fictional book series, Harry potter, saw this coming. And she made a stand! On May 28th 2020, Devex, a social enterprise and media platform for the global development community published an online article titled, ‘Opinion: Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate’. Commenting on the article, J.K Rowling tweeted this: ‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud? That was the beginning of her troubles!

According to Rowling, it wouldn’t have hurt the article authors and the whole of devex to call a woman a woman (after all, they are the only people who ‘biologically’ or ‘genetically’ or ‘scientifically’ menstruate)! However, the current sensitive world couldn’t let that go! She was insulted and called everything hurtful.

Movie actors (Eddie Redmayne, actor Daniel Radcliffe and many others), especially of Harry Potter series criticized her for the comments. A school in West Sussex stopped its plans to name one of its houses after J.K Rowling simply because she had stood for women in that way. And, yeah, two leading Harry Potter fan sites distanced themselves from her (see the statement here). And many more attacks! And here is the surprise!

J.K Rowling didn’t bow down or apologize amidst the threats. In a series of social media engagements on Twitter, the famous author engaged her more than 14 million followers. And when this didn’t seem to be enough, she went ahead, and, in a very long article on her own blog, Rowling explained herself and why she stands where stands or where she stood. It is one of the best article on this. She writes:

“We’re living through the most misogynistic period I’ve experienced. Back in the 80s, I imagined that my future daughters, should I have any, would have it far better than I ever did, but between the backlash against feminism and a porn-saturated online culture, I believe things have got significantly worse for girls. Never have I seen women denigrated and dehumanized to the extent they are now. From the leader of the free world’s long history of sexual assault accusations and his proud boast of ‘grabbing them by the pussy’, to the incel (‘involuntarily celibate’) movement that rages against women who won’t give them sex, to the trans activists who declare that TERFs need punching and re-educating, men across the political spectrum seem to agree: women are asking for trouble. Everywhere, women are being told to shut up and sit down, or else.“

Now you can see why I believe that the extremes of the LGBT social movement are a major roadblock to women empowerment and emancipation!

In J.K Rowling’s article, she talks of of her earlier support for Maya Forstater, the woman who had lost her job simply because she tweeted that people cannot change their biological sex! If a person, this time a woman, can be forced out of employment simply because she stated what she believes in, which, by the way, is biologically true, where is democracy? Where is women emancipation and empowerment here? Isn’t this thing of ‘democracy’ as propagated by left wing a pure lie?

According to BBC report, Maya Forstater had argued: “Framing the question of transgender inclusion as an argument that male people should be allowed into women’s spaces discounts women’s rights to privacy and is fundamentally illiberal (it is like forcing Jewish people to eat pork)”. Surprisingly, she lost the case the judge who believed that “The approach is not worthy of respect in a democratic society.” But all that Maya wanted was her freedom to be a woman and express it as she knows it right. In her words: “All I ever wanted on this was for people to be able to talk about the policy questions around sex and gender identity in a normal, open, democratic way”.

Take Home: So, I ask again, where is democracy here? By forcing health workers to drop some language and pick up on the other, aren’t we (LGBT), indeed, ‘forcing Jewish people to eat pork’? Share your views in the comments section below or write to thecompletey@gmail.com.

READ THIS TOO: Should there be such thing as ‘right to homosexuality’?

Thank you